There is a good article in The Atlantic of all places by a science writer, David Dobbs. He writes about research done by Marian Bakermans-Kranenburg who worked with children who were way over on the sensitive/reactive/irritable end of the spectrum.
Then he goes on to review other research to link these kids, in part, to a specific gene allele that was linked to the processing of serotonin. This is linked to a vulnerability to depression
What the article was mostly about was that some kids are genetically more reactive than others. It discusses how if these kids have a stressful childhood they often go on to have difficulties with anger, ADHD and impulse control in the rest of their lives. But the more surprising part seemed to be that if these kids were more nurtured and protected they often went on to not only do OK, they went on to be more crative, spontaneous and successful than others in many areas.
It is no surprise to me that people are made differently and that some of those difference can be helpful and exciting, but also, under different circumstances, the same qualities can get someone messed up.
What is new is that with new technologies we are finding ways to see more of what is interacting with what. We can watch the blood flows in the brain as the brain reacts to different situations and we can see gene patterns that emerge and are partly linked to personalities.
The implication is often that this can lead to new levels of treatment interventions that can be more specifically designed. However, at present, this is also very dangerous. Because what we are really seeing is that the mind/body/brain/environmental interactions are even more complex that we had conceived. These interactions are going on constantly, and thus the conditions are constantly changing and making new conditions. When you mess with two factors out of a thousand, you can't be sure of what you're going to get.
Interfering with this flow of events is really what I do. But I have to do it indirectly, by talking to someone. As I said a couple of posts ago, I can't get directly to the brain or the mind. But some some people are going to think that they can, and this will either be a great break-through or a real disaster.
I can imagine a time when knowing someone's genetic make-up could be helpful in designing a psychotherapeutic treatment plan. Some people are naturally more quiet and reflective. Others learn better from behavioral experiences. Do you think we will ever be able to tell who is which, just by looking through a microscope at a slide of someone's spit?
3 comments:
Wouldn't that be nice! And no, I don't think it could ever happen-- the old "nature vs. nurture" thing. It might be able to enable recognizing pre-dispositions.
I dont think that will happen. I think you will able to see tendancies in their spit but not the whole of the person
I would never say never.
But if people around them (teachers, parents,caregivers,employers etc.)could learn to adapt their own behaviors around the different personalities of the person, (be it child or adult)the spit wouldn't matter as much.
Cookie cutter society makes it so hard for people to cope.
Post a Comment